Jose Guadalupe Posada, “Calavera de Don Quijote”
Mexican printmaker & political cartoonist (1852-1913)
This week another high-end destination restaurant has opened in the heart of the Downtown Eastside, this time in the main floor of the low-income affordable York Rooms hotel at 261 Powell Street. Cuchillo, which means “knife” in Spanish, is a “modern pan-Latin” 93-seat restaurant serving a typical mishmash of appetizer plates and premium cocktails that easily prices out the low-income DTES community. The restaurant space was a long-decommissioned Japanese bathhouse, one of five in the neighbourhood that once served as communal gathering spaces for a thriving working-class Japanese Canadian community. Now redeveloped into a high-end destination restaurant for tourists and condo dwellers, Cuchillo makes a clear statement to the low-income residents of the York: your days are numbered.
York Rooms was recently purchased by Steven Lippman, adding to the many single-room occupancy hotels in the DTES that he has aggressively acquired. Lippman is an infamous landlord and real estate developer who has been accused of discriminatory renting, aggressive acquisitions, and complicity in illegal evictions. His business model is painfully simple: acquire cheap rental housing, evict the residents, renovate the space and raise the rents. Earning his initial fortune by founding Whistler Water, he is now founder and president of Living Balance International, a real estate firm that owns over 30 properties and over 300 SRO units in the DTES, including the illegally evicted American Hotel. Self-described as an “entrepreneur with a soul,” for the last six years his focus has been exclusively on aggressive real estate plays. Now he’s become a professional gentrifier and eviction specialist who has made millions off the displacement of Vancouver’s poorest citizens.
Lippman’s many victims
The list of properties Lippman has aggressively gentrified runs long. The American Hotel, the Lotus Hotel, the Piccadilly Hotel and the Alexander Residence are just a few we know of. Typically these transactions are disguised by holding companies. Occasionally, Lippman’s toxic business model is successfully resisted: in 2012, Lippman’s attempted purchase of the Wonder Rooms and Palace Hotel was prevented by a court, after protesters set up camp outside his West Vancouver residence. And in 2010 an illegally evicted resident of the Golden Crown Hotel at 116 W Hastings won their lawsuit against the former owners of the property, which Lippman had purchased in 2009. The lawsuit forced Lippman to re-house an evicted tenant in an upscaled unit at the original rent. But this was a small victory in the struggle against Lippman’s war on the poor. Generally his tactics have been successful, unimpeded by courts or the City, despite his well-earned reputation as a hostile landlord eager to push out tenants at the slightest provocation.
Recently Lippman darkened Vancouver’s cultural skies with his eviction of the artist collective Red Gate in 2011, from the 152-156 West Hastings space that had served as a cultural community hub for years. “He says he’s going to come and change the locks on us tomorrow,” Red Gate operators said about Lippman, “and throw all our stuff in the trash if it’s not out. Thanks dude, remember the good times.” This casual eviction was part of Lippman’s $15.1 million acquisition of significant portions of the south side of the 100 West Hastings block, across the street from the Woodward’s redevelopment. Lippman’s financer, Instafund, later bragged that the newly “revitalized” space had been completely vacant, prompting an open response from Red Gate member Bill Young last week. Living Balance International also managed two commercial properties at 122 and 130 West Hastings, which changed hands between holding companies for $11.5 million in 2011.
Development Sign protesting Red Gate’s eviction, by artist Jim Carrico
None dare call them corrupt. “Creative” is more like it
Lippman’s buildings in the DTES have rooms that currently rent from $450 to $900. They are typically marketed to international students and temporary workers in need of short-term rental. By keeping units as single room accommodations lacking kitchen or private bathroom facilities, Lippman circumvents the already loose bylaw designed to prevent the loss of affordable housing stock. As community activist Wendy Pedersen noted after the redevelopment of the American Hotel by Lippman, “This is a dangerous model that the city shouldn’t try to replicate.” Yet the City has turned a blind eye to this ongoing practice of eviction and upscaling.
Far from taking precautions, the City has been eager to replicate these gentrification successes. The city is driving gentrification partly due to the seizure of 32 properties from developer Millenium in the wake of its default during the Olympic Village construction. After letting Millenium off the hook for its remaining debt (almost $100 million of write-offs) the city now needs to maximize the value of its seized holdings to minimize its deficit. Vision Vancouver’s solution to this problem is to encourage real estate speculation in the areas surrounding these properties.
City Hall apparently sees no problem aligning its interests with the developer lobby that helped elect them. But with government and private industry colluding to maximize property value, it is the renting majority that suffers. Instead of using our Millenium acquisitions to guarantee the social housing that was mysteriously lost from the original Olympic Village proposal, and thereby safeguard existing SRO units in the DTES, Vision Vancouver has decided to liquidate these assets, accelerating the gentrification of the area. From the perspective of a developer-run city hall, social housing and other low-income affordable units are seen as obstacles to maximizing property values, and thus are to be avoided whenever possible.
Two of the properties seized from Millenium, 198 West Hastings and 177 West Pender, are on the very same block Lippman is aggressively gentrifying. In 2011, the Province Building at 198 West Hastings was assessed at $7 million and appraised at $10 million. After its neighbour Red Gate was evicted by Lippman and several other buildings on the block were upscaled, the city sold 198 West Hastings in 2012 for $18 million — 80% over its appraised value. The empty lot at 177 West Pender, appraised at $3 million, is still owned by the City. Given that this lot is next door to City-funded supportive housing in the Avalon Hotel, it will be telling to see what happens to it.
In this ongoing gentrification war — waged against the poor by multi-millionaires like Steven Lippman and Robert Fung, and their allies at City Hall — restaurants like Cuchillo and PiDGiN are expendable foot soldiers. Restaurateurs are financially incentivized to participate in displacement, since huge real estate corporations can afford to lease commercial spaces at rock-bottom rates to attract high-end businesses and consumers to low-income neighbourhoods. These rich landlords will take losses for months or even years to attract further investment in the area, profiting in the long term as their properties appreciate in value. Eventually, if a business outlives its usefulness, it can be quickly dispatched, as in the case of the Waldorf.
Currently the City is even beginning to mimic this model with creative leasing arrangements, as in the case of the Hootsuite deal and the planned “tech innovation hub” in the former police station on Main Street. By providing reduced or even free rent to corporations, the city can accelerate the gentrification process and rapidly increase property values, maximizing tax revenues and the future rents or sales of public land. By maximizing real estate companies’ profits, Vision Vancouver also ensures they will continue to receive enormous corporate donations to fund their re-election campaigns and advance their pro-gentrification agenda.
A racist past, brought back to the future
“Let our slogan be for British Columbia: ‘No Japs from the Rockies to the seas’”
–Ian Alistair Mackenzie, MP, from his nomination speech, September 1944.
Powell Street, home to Vancouver’s Japanese community for more than a century, was the birthplace of a prolific working-class people who battled and survived everything from anti-immigrant vigilantes to state-sponsored racist terror. Hundreds of small businesses were established in Japantown or “Little Toyko” and made Powell Street one of the city’s top economic engines that fed the city’s growing tax coffers. And yet thousands of immigrant families struggled just to stay alive in both Japantown and in the racially-segregated, apartheid Vancouver at the turn of the 20th century. Japanese Canadians were denied voting rights, barred from joining white industrial unions, and prohibited from public sector employment. The Japanese Language School on Alexander Street was one of the community centres where the city’s first general strike of Asian workers was organized in response to white racist attacks on Chinatown and Japantown residents and businesses in September, 1907.
Vancouver Japanese Language School, 1906. VPL Accession Number: 85994
White supremacy rose to new despicable heights in 1942 with the mass roundups and herding of Japanese Canadians into British Columbian concentration camps during World War II. Japanese Canadians were explicitly targeted by the federal government as “enemy aliens” and Chinese Canadians were classified as “allied aliens” despite a total lack of evidence of wrongdoing. “In Vancouver, there was so much confusion in the Powell Street area, you would have thought it was the scene of a fire”, wrote Kaoru Ikeda in her December 1942 internment camp diary. With internment the Canadian government decimated the community, deporting and separating families and forcibly scattering thousands of Japanese Canadians to the interior of Canada and along the U.S.-Canadian border. Japanese Canadians found themselves facing violent, fortress-based gentrification and residential displacement by racially-justified, military means.
After internment, Japanese Canadians reorganized and continued to both suffer and struggle against racial, class and institutional discrimination throughout Canada. But in a handful of years, despite their diasporic and stigmatised condition, Japanese Canadians would become a major force in the rebellious “geography of the unseen” in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver. Unseen as well in DTES were First Nations communities, the original caretakers of this unceded land, the Coast Salish people, Chinese and South Asian immigrants, and Italian and Ukrainian working-class women and men — all who laboured and produced huge profits for Vancouver’s white ruling elite and emerging corporate class.
Building K, Men’s Dormitory (formerly Forum), Hastings Park, Vancouver, BC, 1942; Photo by Leonard Frank, VPL Accession Number: 14918
The Downtown Eastside is historic, pivotal and contested terrain in Vancouver’s axis of real estate, power and oppression. It’s a place that breeds popular resistance to colonization, concentration camps and consumerism. Immigrant rights organizing and women’s centred activism have always been at the forefront of anti-colonial and anti-racist movements, and in particular First Nations sovereignty struggles. Here in the Downtown Eastside, communities created social justice coalitions to end sexual violence against women, locally and across British Columbia and Canada, and it is here that activists fought to create Insite, Canada’s first and only safe-injection facility. Aboriginal women’s leadership is the central force in the fight for social housing, and was essential to exposing the crimes of serial killer Robert Pickton, as well as the negligent complicity of the Vancouver Police Department and the R.C.M.P. Without their constant vigilance and activism, our neglectful governors would never have admitted to their botched investigations of missing and murdered women, which we now know were the direct result of “blatant failures” and “systemic bias” against this community by the supposed enforcers of law.
Despite these atrocities, or perhaps in defiance of them, Powell Street is home to a diverse and working-class people’s history. It also remains a site of multi-generational trauma. And it is here that Cuchillo’s investors and landlord Steven Lippman have now planted their “flag of business.” In doing so, they’ve stuck a displacement dagger in the heart of Japantown, the DTES, and in unceded Coast Salish soil. But this community won’t go down without a fight. This history of resistance is unforgettable.
DTES residents and allies will host a media conference outside of Cuchillo Restaurant at 261 Powell Street this Friday, July 5th at 6pm.
Part two of this article, on the racist decor of the Cuchillo Restaurant, can be found here.

Emilia
July 4, 2013 at 6:25 pm
It is informative and helpful to read about how Lippman has used the conduits of law and City Hall to amass himself fortune from displacement. Their work to trace his practices of business is much appreciated. However, with respect, Ellan and Marquez deploy a couple of fallacies of relevance in this article, which leaves me wondering what the real object of their critique is. The title seems to suggest that the subject is Cuchillo and its owners. Yet in the article, the restaurant is only mentioned in passing as a mere “foot soldier” in the gentrification strategies of others (this assessment would seem to be true). It is Lippman, Cuchillo’s landlord, who gets most of the ink. And really it should be, since this article seems to be about the structural processes that continue to enable displacement. The first relevant fallacy, then, would be that the title of the article – and perhaps the topic of the media conference listed for this Friday?– flay the foot soldier when clearly the issue is with the General. I would stress that Lippman and Cuchillo’s owners (Lippman’s tenants) occupy two very different positions in this situation. The second relevance fallacy is the heavy-handed association with Cuchillo and WWII Japanese-Canadian internment and dispossession. The two are connected by a shared geography – Japantown past and present – but to suggest Cuchillo represents a “racist future” is rather an unsophisticated argument. Among several things, the structure’s of Ellan and Marquez’s writing, whether deliberately or not, makes it seem like Cuchillo is the cause of the erasure of histories of Japanese-Canadian struggle. It also precludes that present lived experience and memory can co-exist, and is negligent that the practice of remembering Japanese-Canadian internment is not confined to the absolute space of Japantown.
Standing Water
July 4, 2013 at 6:34 pm
Yeah, what will Vancouver do once all of its junki—I’m sorry, it’s artists are forced to leave? I mean, seriously, a town without smackheads, is that even a town?
Tim
July 5, 2013 at 11:54 pm
We can judge a protest by who the protestors go after, and who they ignore.
Once again we see Not-Homeless Dave, Tami Cosmic-Starlight-Decolonizer, Wendy-Jean-Ivan and their pals go after a menu, and ignore the drug dealers and pimps working right across the street. Whose side are they on?
Shit. Are drug dealers and pimps the only businesses these people approve of? Judging by their targets, it seems so.
They complain about tapas. They ignore heroin. And then they wonder why no one takes them seriously.
Standing Water
July 6, 2013 at 2:11 pm
Oh, you need to dig deeper, the horror, the horror is greater than that. The poverty pimps are in business with the dealers, de facto if not de jure—no dealers means no smack/crack, means no broken nervous systems in need of the tender mercies of the pimps. The drug dealers help create the clients for the poverty pimps, so of course they don’t attack them, they’re part of the little scam the pimps have going down there.
Tim
July 6, 2013 at 5:16 pm
You make an interesting point.
It is certainly the case that these permanent protestors are in bed with VANDU. They sit on the same committees, they run the same demonstrations, they march under the same banners, and they elect one another to the Board of Carnegie.
On June 6th, Wendy Pedersen was elected to the Board of Directors of Carnegie. The Carnegie Board runs the Carnegie Community Action Project, which Wendy supposedly quit when Vancity threatened to pull their funding.
She got the help of VANDU in order to win her election last month. Quid pro quo — Dave Hamm, the president of VANDU, marches with Wendy and her pals. And VANDU pays a “stipend” so that their members can make time from their busy schedules to “demonstrate” against… whatever.
Even if the ex-Pidgin demonstrators found the courage to take on the drug dealers, VANDU would never allow it. We all know why.
Patty Bushwaugh
July 7, 2013 at 9:01 pm
That’s a funny assertion, given that the Brandon Grossutti (Pidgin’s owner) is regularly seen chatting with drug dealers during the pickets there. He tends to distance himself once people take out their cameras, though.
Tim
July 7, 2013 at 11:21 pm
Are the drug dealers now actually walking on the picket line? I thought they were more discreet than that.
Patty Bushwaugh
July 8, 2013 at 8:25 am
Har har. They’ve never joined the picket, though they have threatened to bear spray it.
Tim
July 8, 2013 at 8:37 am
Why would the drug dealers bear spray a picket that so openly serves their interests?
As long as the picketers attack pickles, and ignore heroin, the drug dealers are happy. If the picketers ever found the moral courage to go after the REAL cause of suffering and agony in the DTES, the drug dealers would be annoyed.
Drug dealers don’t care about people with pickleitis. In fact, such people make their lives a lot easier. People with pickleitis draw attention away from their predatory exploitation of the poor, the prostitutes, and the addicted.
Strange how that works. Obvious that it does.
Dave Rouleau
July 8, 2013 at 5:52 pm
I haven’t said to much about this new project Dave Rouleau and I have taken on but the more time I spend in Vancouver, particularly the DTES – the more I realize how corrupt our “system” has become. Within the last few months I have gone to community meetings, hosted public events and observed the drug culture with inquisitive on unbiased eyes. Our building is in the midst of being transformed from a drug dealing induced operation to affordable SRO units for the working poor, students, artists, persons with disabilities, and anyone who is looking for a clean and safe place to live in the DTES. People like you and me who are just trying to make it in this world and don’t want to worry about stepping on a fucking used needle that our tax dollars are paying for – tax dollars that enable drug use and dealing rather than going towards the rehabilitation and detox centres for people with addiction….money that could go towards proper care, integration, and localization…
Last Friday I finished my shift and walked over to our new home and was greeted by 60 protestors who were screaming out inaccurate information and targeting the new restaurant on the main floor of our building. Yes, these are the same people that you have seen in front of the Pidgin on various media outlets – the same people that trespassed into our building – the ones who get a stipend to protest buildings that were once decrepit, unliveable, and boarded up which have been remodelled by people who have worked hard to make a living for their families – buildings where people who come to live here from war torn countries have to reside with drug dealers, prostitution rings and an incredible amount of illegal activity.
The best part was when one of our residents stormed down and screamed “You don’t give a shit about the people who live in this community – I have to suck cock in ten minutes to make money, get back in you cars and drive home to Kistilano”.
I want to invite these protestors to spend a night at 259 and watch the line of people neatly filed in the back alley in a line-up longer than I have seen at any night club to pick up their fix for the night and stay in the morning to help clean up the needles we find each morning in the bathrooms, hallways, and every nook and cranny…….come to one of our events where we sit with people who live on the streets and in other SRO’s – people who we know by name, story, and treat as human beings rather commodities or problems or pretend to fight for our own financial benefits…
If you want to protest something go stand in front of a fucking McDonalds or Walmart – demand nutrition for the poor and building community values through interaction, localization and uncovering the truth and reality of the situation…. – Monika Benkovich
Dave Rouleau
July 8, 2013 at 6:05 pm
Well said Tim. You are a breath of fresh air. I have proof that our building at 259 Powell Street was occupied by drug dealers, not even living there, but just renting the rooms for herion and crack distribution. One of these said rooms, one that we had to evict because the non-existent tenant did not pay rent, was approached by red headed protestor Wendy via a small note under the door saying ‘I can help with eviction / relocation’. Now this room was not occupied by a real person, it was a set up room, it was basically abandoned, the dealer had set up the room so he could access the building and had been paying the rent. When Wendy slid the note under the door she mis-read the eviction notice on the door and made the note out to me, Dave, the landlord, proving that she did not know this person at all. She trespassed into our building on the 2nd of the month with the sole purpose of sliding notes under the door of any one with an eviction notice on their door. Why? Why are these folks blind to the truth? The dealers are using them as a cloak and they are either falling for it or in on it. Oh by the way some of the dealers, are also on disability and receiving government cheques. . . which thickens the plot.
Kenji
July 9, 2013 at 9:57 am
As a Japanese Canadian person, my view of the soi-disant Social Justice Zone is that it is an abomination. The junkies drove out customers and the stores had to close. Displacement is a fact of life, and Japanese Canadians are generally speaking not big whiners, and what is one more eviction, one more loss? “Shigata ga nai,” they say – roughly equivalent to “it is what it is.”
However, a cultural inclination towards education and assimilation – a virtue! – means that the Japanese Canadian flight from the area did not do them any lasting harm. Once in a while, we come back to Oppenheimer Park to go to the Japanese Buddhist church, and check out the neighbourhood.
It is not in the Mainlander’s brief, it would seem, to understand this, but guess what? Some people with DTES connections, like me, actually appreciate and welcome renovations and the influx of actual jobs.
Being a dick about it is not cool, of course. Gentrification is a taboo, dirty word for a number of reasons, and foremost among them is a failure to assuage the fears of the incumbents.
Tim
July 9, 2013 at 10:39 am
Kenji makes an excellent point, one utterly overlooked by the authors of this article.
The Japanese-Canadians of the Oppenheimer District were forcibly removed during WW II, and relocated to internment camps in the Interior. When allowed to return, they often discovered that their assets had been seized, and their land taken without just compensation. Mainlander readers surely know the tragic story.
Even so, these hard-working citizens started again, and by the end of the Fifties had significantly re-established themselves as a resident and commercial force in the neighbourhood. The modern Temple, the new Japanese Language School, and the origins of the Powell Street Festival began their rise in this period.
But then, as Kenji correctly describes, the junkies moved in. Their presence, their anti-social behaviour, and their retinue of drug dealers, pimps and prostitutes created enormous fear — especially among the elderly. Once again, the Japanese-Canadians were driven out of their own neighbourhood.
It is a bit rich for Ellan and Marquez to oppose “driving out” the drug addicts when their clients did the very same to the Japanese.
It is more than ridiculous for Ellan, Pedersen, Swanson, Drury and the rest of the Carnegie gang to try to shut down an honest restaurant, while deliberately overlooking the drug dealers, the pimps, the prostitutes and the addicts who seized Oppenheimer in the first place.
The Cuchillo picket has very little support, especially among the original Japanese community of Oppenheimer.
What’s good for the goose…
Kenji
July 9, 2013 at 11:47 am
To be fair, I don’t speak for the Japanese, just myself. Maybe there is support for what you call the Carnegie gang among the JCs and maybe there isn’t. I feel that most of us have just ‘moved on’ but I haven’t got any studies.
Also speaking just personally, I don’t believe that the ‘Carnegie gang’ are ridiculous people, or that they are poverty ‘pimps’ in the sense that they deliberately work their employees for self-enrichment. I was a social worker and they are just social workers too as far as I can see. No social worker would actually mind being put out of business. We would all love to have to find a different industry. If we were people who wanted to get rich, we would have taken Commerce, right?
But I believe that they have erred by losing perspective. They feel the pain of their clients so closely that they have adopted the attitudes, wishes, and values of their clients. If their clients want crack, then crack must be good. If their clients want to be immunized against seeing the (presumably) contemptuous glaces of urban foodies, then restaurants must be bad.
And, because the ‘Carnegie gang’ are neither bad nor stupid people, they construct elaborate dialectics and rationalizations, to couch the unfortunate but very predictable and in no way abnormal gentrification of the DTES as a war on class or a systematic assault on human rights.
Morally, what they are doing is no better than codependency. I know if my brother or friend or dad had, say, gangrene, I’d use every tool at my disposal to get them into the doctor pronto to get fixed. But because this is drug addiction, and because that drug addiction was caused in part by victimization, well then drug addiction must be the right response and nurtured.
Tim
July 9, 2013 at 12:51 pm
You make a good and kind point about some of the picketers. Their sincerity cannot be doubted, though their myopia is apparent to all but themselves.
But the leadership of the picket is driven by ideology, not kindness. Read what they write. Listen to how they say it. When you do, as many have done, it is quickly clear that Cuchillo is simply another opportunity to campaign for an ideology in which people are of no particular value. They have even been repudiated by the Downtown Eastside Neighbourhood Council.
Does anyone remember Not-Homeless Dave’s so-called “hunger strike”? It achieved nothing. No housing was built by Dave. No meals were fed by Dave. At the end they held a self-congratulatory dinner at Carnegie, and gave him cala lilies. His wheelchair disappeared overnight, and he went home to North Van.
Consider the failed Pidgin picket. NONE of the people who actually live at Pigeon Park could be bothered to walk ten feet to join it. That line was profoundly irrelevant to their lives, and its ideology an insult.
Today, it is the same at Cuchillo. NO ONE who actually lives at Oppenheimer Park marches on the picket line. They can’t be bothered. It is meaningless to them.
As you said, Kenji, these picketers are promoting dependency. They are defending the ghetto and the status quo. Their ideology is obsolete, and their tactics a flop.
Their repetitious failures only make sense in the world of the hamster wheel.
Standing Water
July 10, 2013 at 9:36 pm
“No social worker would actually mind being put out of business.”
This is the sort of thing social workers say and are not called on, but it is nonsense. You’re telling me a middle class social worker with a mortgage, kids to feed, dreams of a vacation every once in a while really wouldn’t mind being made redundant?
With greatest of respect, I have studied the ‘social worker’ phenotype for some time, and my conclusion is that the first lies we tell are to ourselves, and social workers are no different. The lie that they tell themselves is that they’re not self-serving. Human beings are self-serving,
“the ‘Carnegie gang’ are neither bad nor stupid people”
They’re pretty stupid. They appear “smart” because there are state-incorporated schools of social work that allow these people to get “good grades” and to learn a few five dollar words. It’s all smoke and mirrors. Lipstick on a pig, etc. Absent a coercively funded K-University system, their shtick would simply be unintelligible babble to most people, who would never even have been exposed to the depraved “social work” jargon that now infects the lexicon.
If you listen to what these kiddies say, that basically act like it is Schooltime, and they’re Teacher. You’re to be “educated” until you can “pass” their Social Work curriculum. But, as it is said, ‘we don’t need no education / we don’t need no thought control.’ And if you adopt this tactic with them, especially in public, and condescendingly explain to them how they do not understand the world, they lose their shit very rapidly.
“drug addiction was caused in part by victimization”
Other than a _very few_ cases where children under the historical age of responsibility (IIRC 12 for girls, 14 for boys, thereabouts) are forced to use drugs, all drug addiction is caused by the individual’s choice to use drugs. As far as I can tell, part of the social worker dogma is that drug addicts are victims, basically machines that inject/snort/eat drugs as a more or less mechanical reaction to their environment. As far as I can tell, they front this view because then as long as there are junkies (there will always be junkies) they can then claim that there is a need for a drastic overhaul of society, predicated of their incorrect view that society causes junkies through victimization. About as far as you can go for “victimization” is blaming the state for criminalizing the better drugs (marihuana, psilocybin, mescaline, etc.). Thus there is some blame for society due to market distortion, but that is about it—the choice to use or not use fundamentally remains with the user. To suggest otherwise is to suggest something horribly degrading about drug users, that they lack agency. This view is rooted in bad science and bad philosophy.
“They feel the pain of their clients”
Ahhh, just like Clinton. I mean, who’s going to call anyone on that sort of bluff, right?
Tim
July 11, 2013 at 7:17 pm
It looks like some of the myths are exploding. At last.
Swanson, Pedersen and Drury pretend to ‘represent’ the DTES. They do not. They never did. They average nine people on their picket lines. 17,000 people live in the DTES, and they attract NINE of them. Pitiful.
Not-Homeless Dave lives in subsidized housing in North Van. He is not a resident of the DTES. Harsha Walia lives in a luxury condo in Burnaby. She is not a resident of the DTES. Joseph Jones lives in Norquay. He is not a resident of the DTES. Neither is Dave Diewert. It’s all a scam.
Wendy Pedersen pretends that she is an “independent activist”. She is not. On June 6th she was elected to the Board of Carnegie. From that perch she uses her Carnegie network to support her picket lines.
These people belong to the Church of Perpetual Protest.
They “demand” everything. They contribute nothing. This is Vancouver, and that’s what they do.
Today, a counter-protest group representing sixteen different DTES organizations held a press conference. They challenged the Carnegie hegemony. They made it clear that they do NOT support the Church of Perpetual Protest. The DTES Neighbourhood Council threw Drury, Pedersen and Swanson out weeks ago. They got sick of their dominating and controlling ideology.
The DTES party line is falling apart. Eventually, the media will realize that Pedersen, Swanson and Drury have been feeding them a line for years.
Python2
July 11, 2013 at 10:20 pm
Bravo Tim and others…..I am SO sick of these self-serving non-contributors .
Page Turner
July 15, 2013 at 4:44 am
How do you know we do not contribute? I do. How do you know we do not have serious obligations and jobs? I do. Stop spreading lies as rumours and then calling US children.
Prof Al
September 20, 2013 at 7:04 pm
Good analysis of the political economy of real-estate today is fatally flawed by the writers’ meandering off into wartime history… Prof Al